SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Trial registry searches for randomized controlled trials of new drugs required registry-specific adaptation to achieve adequate sensitivity
12 references·2 citing·48 second hop
Trial registry searches for randomized controlled trials of new drugs required registry-specific adaptation to achieve adequate sensitivity (2017)Trial registry searches for randomized co…Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses (2017)Impact of searching clinical …Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting (2016)Compliance with prospective t…Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches? (2014)Searching ClinicalTrials.gov …Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions (2013)Surgical trials and trial reg…Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Methodological developments i…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study (2013)ClinicalTrials.gov registrati…Routine development of objectively derived search strategies (2012)Routine development of object…Identification of Additional Trials in Prospective Trial Registers for Cochrane Systematic Reviews (2012)Identification of Additional …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Searching for Studies (2008)Searching for StudiesEvaluation of methodological search filters—a review (2004)Evaluation of methodological …A technical review of three clinical trials register resources indicates where improvements to the search interfaces are needed (2021)A technical review of three c…Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study (2020)Using the Cochrane Central Re…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research (2000)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? (2015)Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Synthesizing Qualitative Research (2018)From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration (2009)The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)Evaluating adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' policy of mandatory, timely clinical trial registration (2013)Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials—ESORT) (2017)Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review (2017)Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov (2018)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Integrating multiple data sources (MUDS) for meta-analysis to improve patient-centered outcomes research: a protocol for a systematic review (2015)Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology (2015)Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments (2014)Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews (2015)Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen (2018)The association between trauma experienced during incarceration and PTSD outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search (2023)Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias (2017)Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs (2017)Prospective registration trends, reasons for retrospective registration and mechanisms to increase prospective registration compliance: descriptive analysis and survey (2018)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy (2017)Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study (2020)Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers (2022)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews (2011)Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2008Searching for Studies599 cited
  • 2004Evaluation of methodological search filters—a review202 cited
  • 2013Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?112 cited
  • 2017Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses107 cited
  • 2012Routine development of objectively derived search strategies98 cited
  • 2014Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches?75 cited
  • 2016Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting55 cited
  • 2013ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study31 cited
  • 2012Identification of Additional Trials in Prospective Trial Registers for Cochrane Systematic Reviews24 cited
  • 2013Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions24 cited

Cited by

  • 2021A technical review of three clinical trials register resources indicates where improvements to the search interfaces are needed

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

9 cited
  • 2020Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study9 cited