SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Burn clinical trials: A systematic review of registration and publications
12 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Burn clinical trials: A systematic review of registration and publications (2017)Burn clinical trials: A systematic review…Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States (2016)Key cost drivers of pharmaceu…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study (2013)"Hardly worth the effort"? Me…Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis (2012)Publication of NIH funded tri…Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications (2012)Impact of document type on re…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Systematic Evaluation and Comparison of Statistical Tests for Publication Bias (2005)Systematic Evaluation and Com…Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials (1998)Effect of the Statistical Sig…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse (2009)Associations between Intimate Partner Violence and Health among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2014)Racial discrimination and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs (2003)Estimating The Cost Of New Drug Development: Is It Really $802 Million? (2006)The cost of drug development: A systematic review (2011)Estimated Costs of Pivotal Trials for Novel Therapeutic Agents Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2015-2016 (2018)Examining the Use of Real‐World Evidence in the Regulatory Process (2019)Disruption of healthcare: Will the COVID pandemic worsen non-COVID outcomes and disease outbreaks? (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 1998Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials631 cited
  • 2016Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States401 cited
  • 2005Systematic Evaluation and Comparison of Statistical Tests for Publication Bias379 cited
  • 2012Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis371 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2013"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study139 cited
  • 2012Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications129 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work