SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
3 references·16 citing·30 second hop
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Developmen…The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1…How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)How to select outcome measure…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Scoping reviews and their role in identifying research priorities (2025)Scoping reviews and their rol…Revisiting the Delphi technique - Research thinking and practice: A discussion paper (2025)Revisiting the Delphi techniq…The definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: a Delphi method‐based consensus guideline (2024)The definition of treatment r…Evidence requirements of permanently listed digital health applications (DiGA) and their implementation in the German DiGA directory: an analysis (2023)Evidence requirements of perm…The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)The effectiveness of non-phar…Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (COMPAC): a modified Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for trials in perioperative care and anaesthesia (2021)Core Outcome Measures for Per…Doug Altman: Driving critical appraisal and improvements in the quality of methodological and medical research (2020)Doug Altman: Driving critical…A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health (2020)A systematic review finds Cor…A core outcome set for pre‐eclampsia research: an international consensus development study (2020)A core outcome set for pre‐ec…A Core Outcome Set for Pediatric Critical Care* (2020)A Core Outcome Set for Pediat…Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care (2019)Systematic review of clinical…Delphi procedure in core outcome set development: rating scale and consensus criteria determined outcome selection (2019)Delphi procedure in core outc…Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement (2019)Core Outcome Set-STAndardised…Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research (2019)Choosing important health out…Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)Higher number of items associ…Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research (2018)Choosing important health out…Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study (2017)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation (2018)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider? (2023)How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review (2025)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Methods used to assess outcome consistency in clinical studies: A literature-based evaluation (2020)Outcome Reporting in Interventional Necrotizing Enterocolitis Studies: A Systematic Review (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017The COMET Handbook: version 1.02,006 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2016How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline1,105 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys266 cited
  • 2019Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement266 cited
  • 2020A core outcome set for pre‐eclampsia research: an international consensus development study155 cited
  • 2019Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research144 cited
  • 2020A Core Outcome Set for Pediatric Critical Care*129 cited
  • 2020A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health125 cited
  • 2025Revisiting the Delphi technique - Research thinking and practice: A discussion paper125 cited
  • 2019Delphi procedure in core outcome set development: rating scale and consensus criteria determined outcome selection119 cited
  • 2018Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research112 cited
  • 2021Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (COMPAC): a modified Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for trials in perioperative care and anaesthesia

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

112 cited
  • 2025Scoping reviews and their role in identifying research priorities56 cited
  • 2022The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis55 cited
  • 2023Evidence requirements of permanently listed digital health applications (DiGA) and their implementation in the German DiGA directory: an analysis48 cited
  • 2024The definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: a Delphi method‐based consensus guideline45 cited
  • 2019Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care37 cited
  • 2020Doug Altman: Driving critical appraisal and improvements in the quality of methodological and medical research17 cited