Addressing the needs of first‐time fathers in Tasmania: A qualitative study of father‐only antenatal groups

Meredith Nash

28 citations0/0 files storedAustralian Journal of Rural Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Family Dynamics and Relationships Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare Male Reproductive Health Studies

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine how first-time fathers in rural Tasmania experienced father-only antenatal support/education groups. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews with expectant fathers were used for this study. Purposive sampling was used to recruit fathers in 2014. Participants were recruited face-to-face via email through a government health service and not-for-profit organisation that runs a state-wide fatherhood program. Several participants were recruited through a company that holds antenatal education classes for men in a pub. Data were analysed thematically. SETTING: Three rural Tasmanian areas (South, Central Coast and Northern Midlands) PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five men from three rural areas of Tasmania, ≥18 years, about to become first-time father with partner at least 20 weeks pregnant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Semistructured interviews explored men's experiences of father-only antenatal education groups. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (i) motivations for attending antenatal groups; (ii) the effect of the group setting on men's experiences; (iii) masculine stereotypes in antenatal groups; and (iv) strategies to support fathers. Data show men wanted to join the groups and learn about being an involved father. They often felt uncomfortable sharing experiences in discussion-based groups. They tended to prefer information-based groups which were not premised on sharing emotions. Men offered strategies to improve father-only antenatal education groups. CONCLUSION: Tasmanian antenatal education/support programs need improvement. Providing men with multiple opportunities to connect with other fathers is critical to improving support. Groups can be improved by accounting for multiple and complex constructions of masculinity, increasing the number of sessions offered and altering the structure.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Using thematic analysis in psychology 2004The Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities 2009Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis 1999The experiences of new fatherhood: a socio‐cultural analysis 2000Maintaining Masculinity: Men who do ‘Women's Work’2000The Glass Phallus: Pub(lic) Masculinity and Drinking in Rural New Zealand*2008The Big Dry 2015More than the sum of its parts? Contemporary fatherhood policy, practice and discourse

Cited by

2020A narrative review of parental education in preparing expectant and new fathers for early parental skills 2024“I always felt like I wasn't supposed to be there”. An international qualitative study of fathers’ engagement in family healthcare during transition to fatherhood 2023Fathers attending the birth of their baby: Views, intentions and needs

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.