Spatial Fixes and Flows, Development and Local/Global Nexus: A Contribution to the Landscape Research Agenda

Abstract

It is argued in this paper that the gap between the pro-identity rhetoric and practice reflects the lack of an adequate conceptual and methodological framework for the translation of landscape-related and other territorial identity concerns into development policies and their instruments. This limitation could be overcome, it is argued, if the complex, ambiguous and subjective concept of territorial identity were operationalized, that is, transformed into what it is not now: an analytical category, equipped with instruments for the recording, assessment and monitoring of the consumption and (re)production of the existing and emerging local and global spatial fixes and flows that are reflected in the uniqueness of places and regions.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.