Articlediamond2017

The wage penalty for motherhood: Evidence on discrimination from panel data and a survey experiment for Switzerland

Daniel Oesch · Oliver Lipps · Patrick McDonald

59 citations0/0 files storedDemographic Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics Labor market dynamics and wage inequality Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Abstract

Survey-based research finds a sizeable unexplained wage gap between mothers and nonmothers in affluent countries. The source of this wage gap is unclear: It can stem either from the unobserved effects of motherhood on productivity or from employer discrimi

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

References

1973A Theory of Marriage: Part I 2007Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?2001The Wage Penalty for Motherhood 1989Survey Errors and Survey Costs 2015Factorial Survey Experiments 2009Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in britain, germany, and the united states 2010Differences in Disadvantage 2016Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?

Cited by

2020The Constant Gap: Parenthood Premiums in Sweden 1968–2010 2022The Effect of Motherhood on Wages: are women’s wage penalties due to lack of career aspirations?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.