It Is Time to Re‐Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research

Rajat Bhattacharya · Lee M. Ellis

10 citations0/0 files storedBioEssays

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

Problems in peer review, the backbone of maintaining high standards in scientific publishing, have led to wide spread discontent within the scientific community. Training in the peer review process and a simpler format to assist in decision making are possible courses to improve and expedite the process of peer review and scientific publishing.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2011End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments 2012The Glacial Pace of Scientific Publishing: Why It Hurts Everyone and What We Can Do To Fix It

Cited by

2022Publication delays and associated factors in ophthalmology journals

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.