Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

‘Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?’: observations on how peer review panels function

15 references·8 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2002Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation1,766 cited
2009How Professors Think1,084 cited
2012Bias in peer review997 cited
1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
2011Scientific peer review563 cited
2017“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence266 cited
2015Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?225 cited
2018What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?102 cited
2012Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices75 cited
2017What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?68 cited
2014The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels64 cited
1997How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems48 cited
1983Malice's wonderland: Research funding and peer review45 cited
2015Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study32 cited
2014Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

30 cited

Cited by

2024The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds27 cited
2018Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study14 cited
2025Peer reviewer fatigue, or peer reviewer refusal?14 cited
2020What makes an effective grants peer reviewer? An exploratory study of the necessary skills13 cited
2020Decision-making approaches used by UK and international health funding organisations for allocating research funds: A survey of current practice12 cited
2022Meta-research: justifying career disruption in funding applications, a survey of Australian researchers8 cited
2025Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study6 cited
2025Unsuccessful research funding applications: a scoping review of causes and impacts on Australian researchers and research projects5 cited