SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Impact Factor and Altmetrics: What Is the Future?
12 references·1 citing·42 second hop
Impact Factor and Altmetrics: What Is the Future? (2017)Impact Factor and Altmetrics: What Is the…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2014)The Strengthening the Reporti…Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics (2014)Do blog citations correlate w…Value all research products (2013)Value all research productsHow to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects (2013)How to calculate the practica…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…New Indices in Scholarship Assessment (2009)New Indices in Scholarship As…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals Recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2006)The Uniform Requirements for …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Structured Abstracts for Papers Reporting Clinical Trials (1987)Structured Abstracts for Pape…The Impact of the Social Sciences. (1967)The Impact of the Social Scie…Analysis of the original influencing factors and secondary influencing factors of academic papers (2019)Analysis of the original infl…The skewness of science (1992)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics (2015)Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of M endeley user categories (2015)Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media (2016)A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical Articles (1987)A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987)A Cohort Study of Summary Reports of Controlled Trials (1990)A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts (1992)The Handbook of Research Synthesis (1995)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)Is There a Relationship between National Institutes of Health Funding and Research Impact on Academic Urology? (2013)Part II: Should the h-Index Be Modified? An Analysis of the m-Quotient, Contemporary h-Index, Authorship Value, and Impact Factor (2013)The creative person in science. (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Twitter and Research: A Systematic Literature Review Through Text Mining (2020)A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research (2017)Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence (2017)Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities—A literature review (2019)Big Data: A Survey (2014)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Prospective Associations between Depression and Obesity for Adolescent Males and Females- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies (2016)The global prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) among the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Non-adherence to COVID-19 containment behaviours: results from an all-Ireland telephone survey (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies23,532 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,725 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,387 cited
  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2014The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies9,876 cited
  • 2013Value all research products397 cited
  • 2014Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics207 cited
  • 1967The Impact of the Social Sciences.141 cited
  • 1987Structured Abstracts for Papers Reporting Clinical Trials104 cited
  • 2009New Indices in Scholarship Assessment89 cited
  • 2013How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects74 cited
  • 2006The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals Recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors29 cited

Cited by

  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Analysis of the original influencing factors and secondary influencing factors of academic papers
5 cited