SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Updating systematic reviews
16 references·0 citing·52 second hop
Updating systematic reviews (2017)Updating systematic reviewsWhen and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist (2016)When and how to update system…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination (2015)Recent meta-analyses neglect …Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Automating data extraction in…15 years of tracking physiotherapy evidence on PEDro, where are we now? (2015)15 years of tracking physioth…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…When is a further clinical trial justified? (2012)When is a further clinical tr…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy (2009)Cochrane reviews used more ri…Updating Systematic Reviews (2007)Updating Systematic ReviewsEpidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Systematic reviews: when is an update an update? (2006)Systematic reviews: when is a…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Systematic Reviews: Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care (1994)Systematic Reviews: Reporting…Preparing and Updating Systematic Reviews of Randomized Controlled Trials of Health Care (1993)Preparing and Updating System…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)SWIFT-Review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review (2016)Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review (2017)Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review (2022)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Guidelines for reading literature reviews. (1988)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Cumulative meta–analysis: a new tool for detection of temporal trends and publication bias in ecology (2004)When and how to update systematic reviews (2008)Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews (2009)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects (2011)What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary (2016)The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials (2017)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Updating search strategies for systematic reviews using EndNote (2017)Does Talking on a Cell Phone, With a Passenger, or Dialing Affect Driving Performance? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies (2018)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2016When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist424 cited
  • 2015Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review286 cited
  • 2009Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy201 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care169 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?110 cited
  • 201515 years of tracking physiotherapy evidence on PEDro, where are we now?87 cited
  • 1993Preparing and Updating Systematic Reviews of Randomized Controlled Trials of Health Care81 cited
  • 2015Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

63 cited
  • 2012When is a further clinical trial justified?61 cited
  • 2007Updating Systematic Reviews51 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.