Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings

15 references·16 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
1970Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes4,670 cited
2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis4,525 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2014Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration2,959 cited
2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
1978Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.1,949 cited
2009Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences1,124 cited
1967Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox962 cited
2012Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined695 cited
1960The Logic of Scientific Discovery674 cited
2012Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex572 cited
2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology

472 cited

Cited by

2022Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework384 cited
2021Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies196 cited
2020Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results.168 cited
2018Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education128 cited
2019A Brief Guide to Evaluate Replications87 cited
2021Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints.85 cited
2019Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How?61 cited
2020The reproducibility of statistical results in psychological research: An investigation using unpublished raw data.60 cited
2021Open Science, Closed Doors? Countering Marginalization through an Agenda for Ethical, Inclusive Research in Communication60 cited
2019Replicability and replication in the humanities52 cited
2022In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries50 cited
2021Do We Report the Information That Is Necessary to Give Psychology Away? A Scoping Review of the Psychological Intervention Literature 2000–201850 cited
2018Questionable research practices in student final theses – Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor’s perceived attitudes47 cited
2020The “replication crisis” in the public eye: Germans’ awareness and perceptions of the (ir)reproducibility of scientific research46 cited
2020Open Science and Radical Solutions for Diversity, Equity and Quality in Research: A Literature Review of Different Research Schools, Philosophies and Frameworks and Their Potential Impact on Science and Education40 cited
2021Honest signaling in academic publishing37 cited