The impact of Knowledge Management on Organizational Productivity: A Case Study on Koosar Bank of Iran

Jamal El‐Den

82 citations0/0 files storedProcedia Computer Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Knowledge Management and Sharing Innovation and Knowledge Management Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis

Abstract

Knowledge is becoming a valuable asset for most organizations and the quest to manage this asset is gaining popularity among researchers and management. Organizational management’s main objective is to ensure effective and efficient use of its diverse resources such as labor, capital, materials, energy and information in their quest to achieve competitiveness as well as to increase productivity that must be managed. In today’s rapid technological change, companies are in constant struggle to maintain competitive advantage through market differentiation by providing superior products and services. The management in organizations is increasing their focus on employees’ know-how, past experiences and expertise in their quest to excel in achieving their goal. In short, Knowledge has become an integral asset for most organizational functionalities. Knowledge management promises to create the proper structure and the necessary technological infrastructure in organizations and human-driven placement. This research investigates the role of “tacit” knowledge sharing on organizational productivity. Accordingly, a framework was developed and hypotheses were drawn and tested where results demonstrated interesting insights into the role of sharing on organizational productivity. The survey, which was conducted at Koosa Bank of Iran, demonstrated that the employees’ intension to share and consequently the sharing of tacit knowledge has direct positive impacts on productivity. In addition, our analysis demonstrated that not only productivity would increase as a result of knowledge sharing, but also employees’ innovative contributions increased as a result of exposure to others’ knowledge, expertise, and experiences.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 82 citations exist upstream.

References

1994A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation 2001Review : Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations And Research Issues1,2 1991Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures 1959Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy 1996ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.1993Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis 1986Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?2003Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination

Cited by

2020Influence of Knowledge Management Practices on Entrepreneurial and Organizational Performance: A Mediated-Moderation Model 2022Capabilities and Opportunities: Linking Knowledge Management Practices of Textile-Based SMEs on Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Organizational Performance in China 2021The effect of knowledge management on intellectual capital, social capital, and firm innovation 2020The Effect of Marketing Knowledge Management on Bank Performance Through Fintech Innovations: A Survey Study of Jordanian Commercial Banks

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.