SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Astrophysicists and physicists as creators of ArXiv-based commenting resources for their research communities. An initial survey
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Astrophysicists and physicists as creators of ArXiv-based commenting resources for their research communities. An initial survey (2017)Astrophysicists and physicists as creator…Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Scholarly use of social media…A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)A multi-disciplinary perspect…Beams of particles and papers: How digital preprint archives shape authorship and credit (2016)Beams of particles and papers…‘Crackpots’ and ‘active researchers’: The controversy over links between arXiv and the scientific blogosphere (2016)‘Crackpots’ and ‘active resea…Astrophysicists’ Conversational Connections on Twitter (2014)Astrophysicists’ Conversation…Astrophysicists on Twitter (2014)Astrophysicists on TwitterDecoupling the scholarly journal (2012)Decoupling the scholarly jour…Social media use in the research workflow (2011)Social media use in the resea…ArXiv at 20 (2011)ArXiv at 20New journal models and publishing perspectives in the evolving digital environment (2010)New journal models and publis…Extending ArXiv.org to Achieve Open Peer Review and Publishing (2010)Extending ArXiv.org to Achiev…Doing science in the open (2009)Doing science in the openArticle-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact (2009)Article-Level Metrics and the…Can Peer Review Be Better Focused? (2002)Can Peer Review Be Better Foc…The deconstructed journal — a new model for academic publishing (1999)The deconstructed journal — a…First Steps Towards Electronic Research Communication (1994)First Steps Towards Electroni…Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth (2009)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)“Heterogeneous couplings”: Operationalizing network perspectives to study science‐society interactions through social media metrics (2020)Communities of attention networks: introducing qualitative and conversational perspectives for altmetrics (2020)User engagement with scholarly tweets of scientific papers: a large-scale and cross-disciplinary analysis (2022)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Finding scientific gems with Google’s PageRank algorithm (2006)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? (2014)M endeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows (2014)Social Media Scholarship and Alternative Metrics for Academic Promotion and Tenure (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Scholarly Skywriting and the Prepublication Continuum of Scientific Inquiry (1990)Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals (1995)The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching (2004)The Handbook of Journal Publishing (2013)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Predicting the Future with Social Media (2010)Twitter mood predicts the stock market (2011)Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science (2012)Openness and archaeology's information ecosystem (2012)Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach (2015)Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media (2009)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data (2018)Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis (2021)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature (2013)Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide (2016)Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter (2020)Cross-Platform Comparative Study of Public Concern on Social Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study Based on Twitter and Weibo (2021)We Have to Break Up (2009)Usage bibliometrics (2010)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication (2014)Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness of Social Media for e-Learning in Libyan Higher Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis (2015)arXiv E‐prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships (2014)Beyond Bibliometrics (2014)The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature572 cited
  • 2011Social media use in the research workflow344 cited
  • 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
  • 2009Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact244 cited
  • 1994First Steps Towards Electronic Research Communication228 cited
  • 2011ArXiv at 20125 cited
  • 1999The deconstructed journal — a new model for academic publishing98 cited
  • 2012Decoupling the scholarly journal85 cited
  • 2014Astrophysicists’ Conversational Connections on Twitter59 cited
  • 2014Astrophysicists on Twitter47 cited
  • 2016Beams of particles and papers: How digital preprint archives shape authorship and credit36 cited
  • 2009Doing science in the open32 cited
  • 2010New journal models and publishing perspectives in the evolving digital environment31 cited
  • 2002Can Peer Review Be Better Focused?30 cited
  • 2010Extending ArXiv.org to Achieve Open Peer Review and Publishing21 cited
  • 2016‘Crackpots’ and ‘active researchers’: The controversy over links between arXiv and the scientific blogosphere

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.