SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fake facts and alternative truths in medical research
11 references·2 citing·40 second hop
Fake facts and alternative truths in medical research (2018)Fake facts and alternative truths in medi…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Reproducibility in Science (2014)Reproducibility in ScienceAn open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research (2014)An open investigation of the …Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Six red flags for suspect work (2013)Six red flags for suspect workBelieve it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…Is science losing its objectivity? (1996)Is science losing its objecti…Fake news detection: A survey of graph neural network methods (2023)Fake news detection: A survey…Open Science Knowledge Production: Addressing Epistemological Challenges and Ethical Implications (2022)Open Science Knowledge Produc…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature (2016)Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016)The Power of Bias in Economics Research (2017)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)The Politics of Evidence (Open Access) (2016)What is science’s crisis really about? (2017)What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved? (2017)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 2014Reproducibility in Science1,031 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2014An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research311 cited
  • 2013Six red flags for suspect work230 cited
  • 1996Is science losing its objectivity?167 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Fake news detection: A survey of graph neural network methods155 cited
  • 2022Open Science Knowledge Production: Addressing Epistemological Challenges and Ethical Implications15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work