SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Power, Dominance, and Constraint: A Note on the Appeal of Different Design Traditions
8 references·4 citing·37 second hop
Power, Dominance, and Constraint: A Note on the Appeal of Different Design Traditions (2018)Power, Dominance, and Constraint: A Note …Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature (2017)Empirical assessment of publi…Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas: Winners, losers, and recommendations (2016)Charting the future of social…The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)The Statistical Crisis in Sci…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)G*Power 3: A flexible statist…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…The Persistence of Underpowered Studies in Psychological Research: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies. (2004)The Persistence of Underpower…The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. (1962)The statistical power of abno…Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size (2025)Replication value as a functi…Robust data and power in infant research: A case study of the effect of number of infants and number of trials in visual preference procedures (2020)Robust data and power in infa…How reliable are individual differences in eye movements in reading? (2020)How reliable are individual d…Using meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: The case of incomplete neutralization in German (2018)Using meta-analysis for evide…A power primer. (1992)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. (1996)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1975)GPOWER: A general power analysis program (1996)Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (2005)ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies (2015)Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers (2016)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Essentials of Psychological Testing (1960)Sensitivity and Attachment: A Meta-Analysis on Parental Antecedents of Infant Attachment (1997)Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research (2011)A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research (2015)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse? (2017)Open Science (2018)Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science (2021)Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public- Private Partnerships: Patronage, Privatised Profits and Pitfalls DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00655.x (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences (2017)Peekbank: An open, large-scale repository for developmental eye-tracking data of children’s word recognition (2022)The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things (1904)Toward an Interactive-Compensatory Model of Individual Differences in the Development of Reading Fluency (1980)oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments (2016)The preregistration revolution (2018)Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences65,813 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 1962The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.1,824 cited
  • 2014The Statistical Crisis in Science959 cited
  • 2017Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature760 cited
  • 2004The Persistence of Underpowered Studies in Psychological Research: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies.655 cited
  • 2016Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas: Winners, losers, and recommendations116 cited

Cited by

  • 2020How reliable are individual differences in eye movements in reading?58 cited
  • 2020Robust data and power in infant research: A case study of the effect of number of infants and number of trials in visual preference procedures46 cited
  • 2018Using meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: The case of incomplete neutralization in German46 cited
  • 2025Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work