SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Expanding Public Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research
0 references·9 citing·43 second hop
Expanding Public Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research (2012)Expanding Public Access to the Results of…A Behavioral Approach to Understanding the Git Experience (2021)A Behavioral Approach to Unde…The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (2020)The CARE Principles for Indig…Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates (2019)Plan U: Universal access to s…Faculty Attitudes toward Open Access and Scholarly Communications: Disciplinary Differences on an Urban and Health Science Campus (2017)Faculty Attitudes toward Open…Rewarding open access scholarship in promotion and tenure: Driving institutional change (2016)Rewarding open access scholar…Potential Dangers with Open Access Data Files in the Expanding Open Data Movement (2015)Potential Dangers with Open A…The reproducible research movement in statistics (2014)The reproducible research mov…Changing knowledge ecologies and the transformation of the scholarly journal (2014)Changing knowledge ecologies …Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs (2013)Open Access, Megajournals, an…Reproducible Research in Computational Harmonic Analysis (2008)Reproducible research for scientific computing: Tools and strategies for changing the culture (2012)Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting (2013)HOW TO MAKE A PIE: REPRODUCIBLE RESEARCH FOR EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMETRICS (2020)The Chronicle of Higher Education (1977)Chronicle of Higher Education (1996)The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more (2007)A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication (2016)Academic Publishing, Internet Technology, and Disruptive Innovation (2017)Open Access in Theory and Practice (2020)The archaeology of knowledge ; and, The discourse on language (1972)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2012)Interpreting Evidence-of-Learning: Educational research in the era of big data (2015)Adding Sense (2020)The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models (2020)A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open‐access journal publishing (2010)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Open scholarship in Australia: A review of needs, barriers, and opportunities (2020)Faculty self‐archiving: Motivations and barriers (2010)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? (2019)Bulgarian authors’ open access awareness and preferences (2020)Toward a Potential Solution of the Crisis in Scholarly Publishing: An Academic Research Community Alliance Model (2023)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Accelerating scientific publication in biology (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Best Practices for Making Reproducible Biochemical Models (2020)Plan S in Latin America: A Precautionary Note (2020)Preprint manuscripts and servers in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (2020)Data sovereignty for indigenous peoples: current practice and future needs (2016)Genomic Research Through an Indigenous Lens: Understanding the Expectations (2019)Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations (2019)Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Policy (2020)Indigenous Data Sovereignty in the Era of Big Data and Open Data (2020)Tackling algorithmic bias and promoting transparency in health datasets: the STANDING Together consensus recommendations (2024)A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research (2009)Research Methods in Information (2017)Towards FAIR principles for research software (2019)Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)Are Papers with Open Data More Credible? An Analysis of Open Data Availability in Retracted PLoS Articles (2019)Evolution in the Correction of the Literature: Preprints, Manuscript Versioning, Error Amendment, and Retract and Replace (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance1,780 cited
  • 2019Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates49 cited
  • 2014Changing knowledge ecologies and the transformation of the scholarly journal46 cited
  • 2013Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs39 cited
  • 2015Potential Dangers with Open Access Data Files in the Expanding Open Data Movement15 cited
  • 2017Faculty Attitudes toward Open Access and Scholarly Communications: Disciplinary Differences on an Urban and Health Science Campus15 cited
  • 2021A Behavioral Approach to Understanding the Git Experience14 cited
  • 2016Rewarding open access scholarship in promotion and tenure: Driving institutional change14 cited
  • 2014The reproducible research movement in statistics13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work