Explaining reforms: post-New Public Management myths or political realities? Social housing delivery in England and France

Martin Laffin

21 citations0/0 files storedInternational Review of Administrative Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Public Administration and Governance Social Policy and Reform Studies

Abstract

This article examines the assumption that recent reforms in social and public services can be understood as a transition from New Public Management to post-New Public Management. English and French social housing delivery are selected as two cases in which to test out this assumption, for ostensibly these delivery structures share significant cross-national, post-NPM similarities – a movement towards a more ‘enabling’ or steering role for central government, the creation of coordinating agencies, ‘decentralization’ initiatives, the extensive use of public–private arrangements to finance social housing and the involvement of a wide range of extra- and semi-governmental organizations. However, further investigation reveals that these reforms of delivery structures have not been predominantly driven by an unfolding post-NPM managerial or governance logic as the thesis assumes. Rather the reforms have been driven by the partisan electoral and ideological goals of central government policymakers within the context of institutional legacies and entrenched social values. Points for practitioners New Public Management and post-New Public Management have become the conventional wisdom on administrative reforms particularly in a comparative context. This article argues that these ideas reflect an impoverished understanding of public administration given that they assume that change occurs predominantly through the unfolding of managerial and/or governance logics. These logics exclude the critical role of the political parties and other socio-political factors, such as urban unrest, in driving change. This Anglo-French analysis of social housing delivery demonstrates the significance of these political factors in how policymakers define social problems, re-design and implement social housing service delivery systems.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Understanding Governance: Ten Years On 2007Theories of Democratic Network Governance 2011Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency 2003Race Politics in Britain and France 2009Public Management Reform and Modernization 2005Getting into Local Power 2007Introduction Governance Network Research: Towards a Second Generation 2013Struggling giants: city-region governance in London, New York, Paris, and Tokyo

Cited by

2020Performance management in hybrid organisations: A study in social housing 2018Understanding complexity of administrative reform 2023The role of dynamic capabilities on the effectiveness of organizational changes in public sector 2021In the name of “social mixing”: The privatization of public housing to non-governmental organizations 2024Social housing management: a long-term planning perspective on the example of a Polish municipality

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.