SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Sources and Challenges of Norm Generation in Tort Law
16 references·1 citing·42 second hop
The Sources and Challenges of Norm Generation in Tort Law (2018)The Sources and Challenges of Norm Genera…The Many Faces of the Reasonable Person (2019)The Many Faces of the Reasona…The Negligence Standard: Political Not Metaphysical (2017)The Negligence Standard: Poli…The Legally Disruptive Nature of Climate Change (2017)The Legally Disruptive Nature…Situating Urgenda v the Netherlands within comparative climate change litigation (2016)Situating Urgenda v the Nethe…The Urgenda Decision: Netherlands Liable for Role in Causing Dangerous Global Climate Change (2015)The Urgenda Decision: Netherl…The First Successful Climate Negligence Case: A Comment on Urgenda Foundation v. The State of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment) (2015)The First Successful Climate …Serviceable Truths: Science for Action in Law and Policy (2015)Serviceable Truths: Science f…Establishing a Governmental Duty of Care for Climate Change Mitigation: WillUrgendaTurn the Tide? (2015)Establishing a Governmental D…Judge and jurist essays in memory of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry (2013)Judge and jurist essays in me…Climate Change Litigation, Obsession and Expertise: Reflecting on the Scholarly Response to M assachusetts v. EPA (2013)Climate Change Litigation, Ob…Strange Weather, Again (2010)Strange Weather, AgainBeyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world (2010)Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate ch…A New Climate for Society (2010)A New Climate for SocietyStates of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order (2004)States of Knowledge: The Co-p…States of Knowledge (2004)States of KnowledgeScience and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it? (2004)Science and public policy: wh…Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance (2019)Climate change litigation: A …The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change (2006)The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (2007)Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C (2009)A critical appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions (2015)An Inconvenient Truth: How Organizations Translate Climate Change into Business as Usual (2016)Is Green Growth Possible? (2019)The consequences of modernity (1990)Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1992)Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene (2014)Future Imperfect (2015)Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports (2016)The Interpretation of Cultures (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Science in Action (1987)The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation (2010)The Politics of Evidence (Open Access) (2016)Wicked Problems in Public Policy (2022)Why We Disagree about Climate Change (2009)Apocalypse Forever? (2010)Depoliticized Environments: The End of Nature, Climate Change and the Post-Political Condition (2011)Science or Science Fiction? Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change (2012)The politics of climate change (2015)Epistemic geographies of climate change (2016)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change (2010)The Regime Complex for Climate Change (2011)Climate activism and its effects (2020)Climate change and fossil fuel production cuts: assessing global supply-side constraints and policy implications (2020)Climate Change Litigation (2020)Predefined criteria and interpretative flexibility in legal courts’ evaluation of expertise (2019)The Multilevel Regulation of Complex Policy Problems: Uncertainty and the Swine Flu Pandemic (2019)Science and Law in Environmental Law and Policy: The Case of the European Commission (2020)Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea (2009)Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration (2019)Decoding Human Behavior with Big Data? Critical, Constructive Input from the Decision Sciences (2022)Outcome effects, moral luck and the hindsight bias (2022)Blockchain Regulation and Governance in Europe (2018)Governing Climate Change (2018)Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere (2012)Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why? (2016)Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004States of Knowledge2,963 cited
  • 2004States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order2,942 cited
  • 2010A New Climate for Society912 cited
  • 2010Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world419 cited
  • 2004Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it?277 cited
  • 2010Strange Weather, Again189 cited
  • 2017The Legally Disruptive Nature of Climate Change130 cited
  • 2019The Many Faces of the Reasonable Person88 cited
  • 2015Serviceable Truths: Science for Action in Law and Policy68 cited
  • 2015Establishing a Governmental Duty of Care for Climate Change Mitigation: WillUrgendaTurn the Tide?54 cited
  • 2015The Urgenda Decision: Netherlands Liable for Role in Causing Dangerous Global Climate Change47 cited
  • 2013Climate Change Litigation, Obsession and Expertise: Reflecting on the Scholarly Response to M assachusetts v. EPA45 cited
  • 2013Judge and jurist essays in memory of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry39 cited
  • 2016Situating Urgenda v the Netherlands within comparative climate change litigation26 cited
  • 2015The First Successful Climate Negligence Case: A Comment on Urgenda Foundation v. The State of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

19 cited
  • 2017The Negligence Standard: Political Not Metaphysical17 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance287 cited