SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Twelve tips for medical students to conduct a systematic review
16 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Twelve tips for medical students to conduct a systematic review (2018)Twelve tips for medical students to condu…Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote (2017)Reviewing retrieved reference…A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review (2015)A Guide to Conducting a Stand…PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2014)PROSPERO: an international pr…PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a com…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice (2012)Collaboration and Team Scienc…Beyond PICO (2012)Beyond PICOMethodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Methodology in conducting a s…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues (2004)Application of systematic rev…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis (1995)Methodologic guidelines for s…Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1994)Users' guides to the medical …Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical …Systematic Reviews in Medical Education (2022)Systematic Reviews in Medical…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness (2017)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis (2008)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) (1997)Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders (1997)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Review : Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations And Research Issues1,2 (2001)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework (2025)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 2014PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews2,694 cited
  • 2012Beyond PICO2,604 cited
  • 2015A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review1,411 cited
  • 2011Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions1,227 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature813 cited
  • 1995Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis574 cited
  • 2014PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews567 cited
  • 1994Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group486 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2012
Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice
439 cited
  • 2017Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote264 cited
  • 2004Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues243 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Systematic Reviews in Medical Education14 cited