SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A response to Marquis et al. (2017) What is the error margin of your signature analysis? · Study

WorkA response to Marquis et al. (2017) What is the error margin of your signature analysis?

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison2018

OA

Workgreen2018

A response to Marquis et al. (2017) What is the error margin of your signature analysis?

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison · Kaye Ballentyne · Patrick H. Geoghegan

10 citations·0/0 files stored·Forensic Science International

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities 2011Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems 2016A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation 2009Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation 2016Model forensic science 2015Minimizing Contextual Bias in Forensic Casework 2016What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?2013Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: Testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2017What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? IIarticle · 6 shared references 2025A guide to ISO 21043 Forensic Sciences from the perspective of the forensic-data-science paradigmreview · 5 shared references 2020Human Factors in Validation and Performance Testing of Forensic Sciencereport · 4 shared references 2020Cognitive biases in the peer review of bullet and cartridge case comparison casework: A field studyarticle · 3 shared references 2020Comparison and interpretation of impressed marks left by a firearm on cartridge cases – Towards an operational implementation of a likelihood ratio based techniquearticle · 3 shared references 2015Forensic intelligence framework. Part II: Study of the main generic building blocks and challenges through the examples of illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoringarticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year2018

Typeother

Published2018-03-15

VenueForensic Science International

ISSN-L0379-0738

Languageen

Citations10

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.009

openalex_workW2792371637

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.