SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Cross-metric compatability and inconsistencies of altmetrics · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleCross-metric compatability and inconsistencies of altmetrics

Christine Meschede2018

Article2018

Cross-metric compatability and inconsistencies of altmetrics

Christine Meschede · Tobias Siebenlist

47 citations·0/0 files stored·Scientometrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Publishing and Open Access Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 1904The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics 1988The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management 2009New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation 2014How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications 2011Social media use in the research workflow

Cited by

2020Altmetrics data providers: A meta-analysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication 2019Blogs and news sources coverage in altmetrics data providers: a comparative analysis by country, language, and subject 2021Bibliometric and Altmetric Analyses of Publication Activity in the Field of Behcet's Disease in 2010–2019 2021Do researchers know what the h-index is? And how do they estimate its importance?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2019Investigating familiarity and usage of traditional metrics and altmetricsarticle · 10 shared references 2020Other than detecting impact in advance, alternative metrics could act as early warning signs of retractions: tentative findings of a study into the papers retracted by PLoS ONEarticle · 10 shared references 2019Comparing the topological rank of journals in Web of Science and Mendeleyarticle · 8 shared references 2019Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF)article · 7 shared references 2018Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of sciencearticle · 7 shared references 2017The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articlesarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2018

Typearticle

Published2018-02-17

VenueScientometrics

ISSN-L0138-9130

Languageen

Citations47

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11192-018-2674-1

openalex_workW2793099400

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2021

Article-Level Metrics

2021A large-scale comparison of coverage and mentions captured by the two altmetric aggregators: Altmetric.com and PlumX

2020The stability of Twitter metrics: A study on unavailable Twitter mentions of scientific publications

2018Exploratory analysis of Publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact