SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Finding Trends in Software Research
14 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Finding Trends in Software Research (2018)Finding Trends in Software ResearchWhat is wrong with topic modeling? And how to fix it using search-based software engineering (2018)What is wrong with topic mode…Citations, research topics and active countries in software engineering: A bibliometrics study (2016)Citations, research topics an…Topic modelling for qualitative studies (2015)Topic modelling for qualitati…Highly-cited papers in software engineering: The top-100 (2015)Highly-cited papers in softwa…A bibliometric analysis of the Turkish software engineering research community (2015)A bibliometric analysis of th…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Trends in computer science research (2013)Trends in computer science re…Gender, Representation and Online Participation: A Quantitative Study (2013)Gender, Representation and On…Latent Dirichlet Allocation in R (2012)Latent Dirichlet Allocation i…PageRank for ranking authors in co‐citation networks (2009)PageRank for ranking authors …ArnetMiner (2008)ArnetMinerAn analysis of the most cited articles in software engineering journals – 2002 (2008)An analysis of the most cited…Automatic and versatile publications ranking for research institutions and scholars (2007)Automatic and versatile publi…Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis (1998)Software engineering as seen …Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topicsThe Behavior of Stock-Market Prices (1965)The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 (2004)Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time (2009)Mapping the physics research space: a machine learning approach (2019)Revisiting the exploration-exploitation behavior of scholars' research topic selection: Evidence from a large-scale bibliographic database (2022)The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution (1982)The Science Question in Feminism (1986)Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1991)Paradise unplugged: identifying barriers for female participation on stack overflow (2016)Someone like me: How does peer parity influence participation of women on stack overflow? (2017)The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence (2019)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Quantity versus impact of software engineering papers: a quantitative study (2017)A bibliometric assessment of software engineering scholars and institutions (2010–2017) (2018)Trends in high‐impact papers in nursing research published from 2008 to 2018: A web of science‐based bibliometric analysis (2020)Little Science, Big Science (1963)BANKING SECTOR PERFORMANCE, PROFITABILITY, AND EFFICIENCY: A CITATION‐BASED SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (2019)Is China the world’s blockchain leader? Evidence, evolution and outlook of China’s blockchain research (2020)What have we learned from Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis? A citation-based systematic literature review and content analysis (2022)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)A Critique and Improvement of the CL Common Language Effect Size Statistics of McGraw and Wong (2000)Measuring LDA topic stability from clusters of replicated runs (2018)Artificial Intelligence in Innovation: How to Spot Emerging Trends and Technologies (2020)Impact of environmental regulation policy on ecological efficiency in four major urban agglomerations in eastern China (2021)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community (2005)Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem (2010)Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A review (2015)Disruption risks in supply chain management: a literature review based on bibliometric analysis (2020)Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry (1991)Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962–2008: a co‐word analysis (2011)Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)Personalization in personalized marketing: Trends and ways forward (2022)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (2020)Data and code for the essay "Recording scientific progress by its content": OpenAlex article counts (2016–2026) and Science Live replication outcomes (2022)Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook (2017)The potential of emergent disruptive technologies for humanitarian supply chains: the integration of blockchain, Artificial Intelligence and 3D printing (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008ArnetMiner2,135 cited
  • 1998Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis478 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2009PageRank for ranking authors in co‐citation networks402 cited
  • 2015Topic modelling for qualitative studies333 cited
  • 2018What is wrong with topic modeling? And how to fix it using search-based software engineering231 cited
  • 2013Gender, Representation and Online Participation: A Quantitative Study145 cited
  • 2016Citations, research topics and active countries in software engineering: A bibliometrics study114 cited
  • 2013Trends in computer science research67 cited
  • 2015Highly-cited papers in software engineering: The top-10066 cited
  • 2015A bibliometric analysis of the Turkish software engineering research community58 cited
  • 2012Latent Dirichlet Allocation in R50 cited
  • 2007Automatic and versatile publications ranking for research institutions and scholars48 cited
  • 2008An analysis of the most cited articles in software engineering journals – 200247 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work