SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews
16 references·16 citing·42 second hopsampled
A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews (2018)A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appra…The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2010)Designing and Conducting Mixe…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review (2009)Methods for the synthesis of …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)Toward a Definition of Mixed …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006)Conducting a critical interpr…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions (2004)A Process for Systematically …Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evaluating non-randomised int…Whatever happened to qualitative description? (2000)Whatever happened to qualitat…Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English. (2000)Oxford Advanced Learner's Dic…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The feasibility of creating a…Revisitando las revisiones sistemáticas desde la perspectiva metodológica (2023)Revisitando las revisiones si…Coaching culture: an evidence review and framework for future research and practice (2023)Coaching culture: an evidence…Knowledge Mapping of Optimal Taxation Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis and Network Visualization (2022)Knowledge Mapping of Optimal …Entrepreneurial Failure: Structuring a Widely Overlooked Field of Research (2022)Entrepreneurial Failure: Stru…Development of a critical appraisal tool for assessing the reporting quality of qualitative studies: a worked example (2022)Development of a critical app…DEFINING AND ASSESSING THE VALUE OF CANONICAL MIXED METHODS RESEARCH DESIGNS IN PUBLIC POLICY AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (2022)DEFINING AND ASSESSING THE VA…Applying Core Quality Criteria of Mixed Methods Research to an Empirical Study (2022)Applying Core Quality Criteri…Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews? (2021)Systematic Reviews of Systema…Relations Between Students’ Mathematics Anxiety and Motivation to Learn Mathematics: a Meta-Analysis (2021)Relations Between Students’ M…Moving qualitative synthesis research forward in education: A methodological systematic review (2021)Moving qualitative synthesis …Infants, children, and youth in foster care with prenatal substance exposure: a synthesis of two scoping reviews (2021)Infants, children, and youth …El Enfoque integrador de la metodología mixta en la investigación educativa (2021)El Enfoque integrador de la m…Variations of mixed methods reviews approaches: A case study (2020)Variations of mixed methods r…Systematic mixed studies reviews: leveraging the literature to answer complex questions through the integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence (2020)Systematic mixed studies revi…Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology (2020)Leveraging the opportunities …An integrative review on coping skills in nursing students: implications for policymaking (2017)An integrative review on copi…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Thematic Analysis (2017)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited (2009)The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research (2014)Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Editorial: Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research (2008)Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures (2014)Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire (2015)How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design (2017)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 2000Whatever happened to qualitative description?12,118 cited
  • 2010Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research9,356 cited
  • 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
  • 2007Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research6,460 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
  • 2000Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English.2,581 cited
  • 2004A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions2,115 cited
  • 2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups
2,073 cited
  • 2009Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review2,049 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Applying Core Quality Criteria of Mixed Methods Research to an Empirical Study201 cited
    • 2021Relations Between Students’ Mathematics Anxiety and Motivation to Learn Mathematics: a Meta-Analysis125 cited
    • 2017An integrative review on coping skills in nursing students: implications for policymaking85 cited
    • 2021El Enfoque integrador de la metodología mixta en la investigación educativa77 cited
    • 2021Moving qualitative synthesis research forward in education: A methodological systematic review49 cited
    • 2020Variations of mixed methods reviews approaches: A case study37 cited
    • 2020Systematic mixed studies reviews: leveraging the literature to answer complex questions through the integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence31 cited
    • 2021Infants, children, and youth in foster care with prenatal substance exposure: a synthesis of two scoping reviews31 cited
    • 2022Entrepreneurial Failure: Structuring a Widely Overlooked Field of Research28 cited
    • 2022Knowledge Mapping of Optimal Taxation Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis and Network Visualization27 cited
    • 2022Development of a critical appraisal tool for assessing the reporting quality of qualitative studies: a worked example18 cited
    • 2023Revisitando las revisiones sistemáticas desde la perspectiva metodológica17 cited
    • 2023Coaching culture: an evidence review and framework for future research and practice15 cited
    • 2022DEFINING AND ASSESSING THE VALUE OF CANONICAL MIXED METHODS RESEARCH DESIGNS IN PUBLIC POLICY AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION14 cited
    • 2021Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews?13 cited
    • 2020Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology12 cited