Community-Driven Development: Myths and Realities

Scott Guggenheim

64 citations0/0 files storedWorld Bank, Washington, DC eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

International Development and Aid Community and Sustainable Development Local Governance and Development

Abstract

Community-driven development is an approach to development that emphasizes community control over planning decisions and investment resources. Over the past decade, it has become a key operational strategy for many national governments, as well as for international aid agencies, with the World Bank alone currently supporting more than 190 active community-driven development projects in 78 countries. Community-driven development programs have proven to be particularly useful where government institutions are weak or under stress. This paper examines what the evidence shows about the utility of community-driven development programs for helping governments improve the lives and futures of the poor. The paper also addresses recent critiques of the community-driven development approach. The paper makes three main arguments. First, community-driven development offers governments a useful new tool for improving the lives of the poor. The empirical evidence from evaluations confirms that community-driven development programs provide much needed productive economic infrastructure and services at large scale, reasonable cost, and high quality. They also provide villagers, especially the disadvantaged, with a voice in how development funds are used to improve their welfare. Second, community-driven development programs are not a homogeneous category, and it is important to acknowledge the differences between national, on-budget, multi-year programs, and off-budget programs. And finally, community-driven development works best and achieves the greatest results when it is part of a broader development strategy that includes reforms to governance, investments in productivity, and integration with efforts to improve the quality of public service delivery.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community 1977Outline of a Theory of Practice 1988Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital 2007What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?2003World Development Report 2004 : making services work for poor people 2015Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?2012Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia 2014Should Aid Reward Performance? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Health and Education in Indonesia

Cited by

2018Anxiety in Rural Chinese Children and Adolescents: Comparisons across Provinces and among Subgroups 2022Rethinking Heritage for Sustainable Development 2019What Is State Capacity?2024Understanding and addressing the unintended effects of aid localisation 2023“Want to help someone? Shut up and listen”: Foreign aid, maladaptation, and community development practices in the Pacific

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.