SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleHeterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics

Despina Koletsi2018

OA

Articlegreen2018

Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics

Despina Koletsi · Padhraig S. Fleming · Iris Michelaki · Nikolaos Pandis

43 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Dentistry

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews scientometrics and bibliometrics research Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis 2006Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care 1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews 2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency 2017Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses

Cited by

2019Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting 2021Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020 2021Prediction intervals should be included in meta‐analyses published in dentistry 2022Publication bias in randomized controlled trials in dentistry. What factors affect statistical significance of outcomes?2024Language bias in orthodontic systematic reviews: A meta-epidemiological study

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2023Heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comprehensive overviewreview · 9 shared references 2015High statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analysis of continuous than binary outcomesreview · 8 shared references 2019Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta‐analysisreview · 7 shared references 2025Reflections on the I-squared index for measuring inconsistency in meta-analysisreview · 7 shared references 2020Research Note: In a meta-analysis, the I index does not tell us how much the effect size varies across studiesarticle · 6 shared references 2013Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Grouparticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2018

Typearticle

Published2018-05-05

VenueJournal of Dentistry

ISSN-L0300-5712

Languageen

Citations43

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.003

openalex_workW2800407196

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.