SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Singapore statement on research integrity
0 references·16 citing·54 second hop
Singapore statement on research integrity (2011)Singapore statement on research integrityThe tech industry hijacking of the AI ethics research agenda and why we should reclaim it (2022)The tech industry hijacking o…Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research (2021)Exploring the Gray Area: Simi…Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)Development and implementatio…Academic research integrity: Exploring researchers’ perceptions of responsibilities and enablers (2020)Academic research integrity: …THE EMERGING FIELD OF GEOETHICS (2017)THE EMERGING FIELD OF GEOETHI…On (scientific) integrity: conceptual clarification (2017)On (scientific) integrity: co…Responsible Practice of Research: Safeguarding Research Integrity and Publication Ethics (2016)Responsible Practice of Resea…Teaching research integrity in higher education: policy and strategy (2015)Teaching research integrity i…Ethics in Science (2015)Ethics in ScienceHeterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance (2014)Heterogeneity in European Res…Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries (2013)Policies and Initiatives Aime…Conceptual Clarification and the Task of Improving Research on Academic Ethics (2013)Conceptual Clarification and …The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997–2012 (2012)The Committee on Publication …Development and Validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) (2012)Development and Validation of…Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2012)Cooperation between research …“Does Plagiarism Mean anything? LOL.” Students’ Conceptions of Writing and Citing (2011)“Does Plagiarism Mean anythin…Guidelines on good publication practice (2001)Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Publication ethics (2017)Critical essay: Blinding faith – Paradoxes and pathologies of opacity in peer review (2021)The Essence and Transcendence of Scientific Publishing (2022)IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts (1956)Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics (1970)Designing Social Inquiry (1994)Role-playing institutional academic integrity policy-making: using researched perspectives to develop pedagogy (2016)Research Integrity and Hidden Value Conflicts (2021)Coping with scientific misconduct (2011)Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Editors (2014)Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review (2016)Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. (2021)How to Regulate Large Language Models for Responsible AI (2024)Inequity In Social Exchange (1965)A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research (2000)On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. (2001)Global Research Integrity Training (2013)Interventions for Organizational Climate and Culture in Academia: A Scoping Review (2021)Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science (2021)The Responsible Conduct of Research (2001)What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists (2007)Responsible Conduct of Research (2009)Ten Simple Rules for Protecting Research Integrity (2015)Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct (2016)Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications (2017)Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning (1972)Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education (1989)Mentoring in Academic Medicine (2006)Scaffolding Collaborative Case-Based Learning during Research Ethics Training (2020)Dialogical teaching of research integrity: an overview of selected methods (2021)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’ (2016)Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (2021)Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science (1995)Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. (2006)CODE OF ETHICS (2013)Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’ (2017)Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (1997)Epistemic Cultures (1999)Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research (2013)Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? (2021)Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review (2022)On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices (2023)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners (2014)Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions (2022)Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions (2023)How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017THE EMERGING FIELD OF GEOETHICS118 cited
  • 2014Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance73 cited
  • 2021Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research70 cited
  • 2013Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries67 cited
  • 2012Development and Validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC)61 cited
  • 2012The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997–201251 cited
  • 2013Conceptual Clarification and the Task of Improving Research on Academic Ethics35 cited
  • 2012Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)33 cited
  • 2021Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts29 cited
  • 2015Teaching research integrity in higher education: policy and strategy27 cited
  • 2020Academic research integrity: Exploring researchers’ perceptions of responsibilities and enablers23 cited
  • 2022The tech industry hijacking of the AI ethics research agenda and why we should reclaim it23 cited
  • 2016Responsible Practice of Research: Safeguarding Research Integrity and Publication Ethics

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

22 cited
  • 2017On (scientific) integrity: conceptual clarification22 cited
  • 2011“Does Plagiarism Mean anything? LOL.” Students’ Conceptions of Writing and Citing21 cited
  • 2015Ethics in Science21 cited