SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Citation Count Analysis for Papers with Preprints
4 references·0 citing·21 second hop
Citation Count Analysis for Papers with Preprints (2018)Citation Count Analysis for Papers with P…Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review (2017)Reviewer bias in single- vers…Popularity of arXiv.org within Computer Science (2017)Popularity of arXiv.org withi…Identifying Meaningful Citations (2015)Identifying Meaningful Citati…Single- versus double-blind reviewing (2006)Single- versus double-blind r…Are women prejudiced against women? (1968)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review (2022)CiteSeer (1998)Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing (1999)Automatic classification of citation function (2006)Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis (2017)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited (2022)Autonomous citation matching (1999)arXiv E‐prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships (2014)Measuring security development in information technologies: A scientometric framework using arXiv e-prints (2023)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions (2019)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review605 cited
  • 2015Identifying Meaningful Citations153 cited
  • 2006Single- versus double-blind reviewing118 cited
  • 2017Popularity of arXiv.org within Computer Science24 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work