Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Broadening the Science of Broadening Participation in STEM Through Critical Mixed Methodologies and Intersectionality Frameworks

16 references·14 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color29,736 cited
2018Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics [1989]9,508 cited
2013Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis4,110 cited
2012Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students3,139 cited
2012The Problem With the Phrase Women and Minorities: Intersectionality—an Important Theoretical Framework for Public Health2,985 cited
2015Intersectionality's Definitional Dilemmas2,413 cited
2007When Multiplication Doesn't Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm1,984 cited
2015Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines1,514 cited
1998Science and Engineering Indicators 19981,327 cited
2010The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations792 cited
2015What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations.488 cited
2012The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s363 cited
2015Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance298 cited
2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder

240 cited

2013The Intersections of Sexuality, Gender, and Race: Identity Research at the Crossroads234 cited

2016The Frequency of “Brilliant” and “Genius” in Teaching Evaluations Predicts the Representation of Women and African Americans across Fields200 cited

Cited by

2022Perspectives on Active Learning: Challenges for Equitable Active Learning Implementation60 cited
2020Connecting Theory to Practice: Using Self-Determination Theory To Better Understand Inclusion in STEM53 cited
2022The Inclusive Professional Framework for Societies: Changing Mental Models to Promote Diverse, Equitable, and Inclusive STEM Systems Change38 cited
2020Why is Data on Disability so Hard to Collect and Understand?37 cited
2021Differential retention contributes to racial/ethnic disparity in U.S. academia27 cited
2022In/visible: The intersectional experiences of women of color in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine in Australia27 cited
2021Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity25 cited
2019A sponsorship action plan for increasing diversity in STEMM25 cited
2020Gendered Power Relations and Sexual Harassment in Antarctic Science in the Age of #MeToo24 cited
2023How Latiné engineering students resist White male engineering culture: A multi‐institution analysis of academic engagement20 cited
2021National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment19 cited
2022“It Was Hard, and It Still Is . . .”: Women of Color Navigating HSI STEM Transfer Pathways16 cited
2023An Intersectional Application of Expectancy-Value Theory in an Undergraduate Chemistry Course16 cited
2022Productivity in academia: When the rules determine the losers11 cited