Articlegreen2018

Managing Digital Platforms in User Organizations: The Interactions Between Digital Options and Digital Debt

Knut H. Rolland · Lars Mathiassen · Arun Rai

156 citations0/0 files storedInformation Systems Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Digital Platforms and Economics Information Technology Governance and Strategy Information Systems Theories and Implementation

Abstract

As organizations increasingly use digital platforms to facilitate innovation, researchers are seeking to understand how platforms shape business practices. Although extant literature offers important insights into platform management from a platform-owner perspective, we know little about how organizations manage industry platforms provided by external parties to generate opportunities and overcome challenges in relation to their infrastructure and work processes. As part of larger ecosystems, these digital platforms offer organizations bundles of digital options that they can selectively invest in over time. At the same time, organizations’ previous investments in digital infrastructure and work processes produce a legacy of digital debt that conditions how they manage their digital platforms over time. Against this backdrop, we investigate how digital options and digital debt were implicated in a large Scandinavian media organization’s management of a news production platform over nearly 17 years. Drawing on extant literature and the findings from this case, we theorize the progression of and interactions between digital options and digital debt during an organization’s digital platform management in relation to its infrastructure and work processes. The theory reveals the complex choices that organizations face in such efforts: While they may have to resolve digital debt to make a platform’s digital options actionable, hesitancy to plant digital debt may equally well prevent them from realizing otherwise attractive digital options. Similarly, while identified digital options may offer organizations new opportunities to resolve digital debt, eagerness to realize digital options may just as easily lead to unwise planting of digital debt.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 156 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1991Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1998Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 1973The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities 1989Building Theories from Case Study Research 2009Building theories from case study research 1999Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data

Cited by

2025Generative AI and its Transformative Value for Digital Platforms 2019Selecting an open innovation community as an alliance partner: Looking for healthy communities and ecosystems 2022Global value chains and digital platforms: Implications for strategy 2021Novel mechanisms of scalability of financial services in an emerging market context: Insights from Indonesian Fintech Ecosystem 2023The influence of sustainability and digitalisation on business model innovation: The case of a multi-sided platform for food surplus redistribution

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.