Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysisYiren Kong, Young Sik Seo, Ling Zhai2018-05-10reviewComputers & Education306 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLiteracy and Educational PracticesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 306 citations exist upstream.References1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.1981Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research2005Publication Bias in Meta‐AnalysisCited by2021A Comparison of Children’s Reading on Paper Versus Screen: A Meta-Analysis2020Assessing children's reading comprehension on paper and screen: A mode-effect study2023An umbrella review of the benefits and risks associated with youths’ interactions with electronic screens2018Measurement framework for assessing disruptive innovations2019Children's reading comprehension and metacomprehension on screen versus on paper2020Learning by explaining orally or in written form? Text complexity matters2020Digital reading in a second or foreign language: A systematic literature review2022Refutation Text Facilitates Learning: a Meta-Analysis of Between-Subjects Experiments