Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why are women less likely to support animal exploitation than men? The mediating roles of social dominance orientation and empathy

9 references·3 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.4,964 cited
1990Gender Role Stereotypes, Expectancy Effects, and Parents' Socialization of Gender Differences814 cited
2009The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender.758 cited
2011Sex, Personality, and Sustainable Consumer Behaviour: Elucidating the Gender Effect308 cited
2014Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption?294 cited
2012You're Inferior and Not Worth Our Concern: The Interface Between Empathy and Social Dominance Orientation210 cited
2013Environmental Consequences of the Desire to Dominate and Be Superior209 cited
2016Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM)198 cited
2014Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human–human and human–animal relations170 cited

Cited by

2019Animal Images Database: Validation of 120 Images for Human-Animal Studies57 cited
2021Why Are Men More Likely to Endorse Myths About Child Sexual Abuse Than Women? Evidence From Disposition and Situation-Based Approaches15 cited
2023Bystanders’ reactions to animal abuse in relation to psychopathy, empathy with people and empathy with nature10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work