Articlebronze2018

A Survey on Artifacts from CoNEXT, ICN, IMC, and SIGCOMM Conferences in 2017

Matthias Flittner · Mohamed Naoufal Mahfoudi · Damien Saucez · Matthias Wählisch · Luigi Iannone · Vaibhav Kumar Bajpai +1 more

17 citations0/0 files storedACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Scientific Computing and Data Management Research Data Management Practices Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

Reproducibility of artifacts is a cornerstone of most scientific publications. To improve the current state and strengthen ongoing community efforts towards reproducibility by design, we conducted a survey among the papers published at leading ACM computer networking conferences in 2017: CoNEXT, ICN, IMC, and SIGCOMM. The objective of this paper is to assess the current state of artifact availability and reproducibility based on a survey. We hope that it will serve as a starting point for further discussions to encourage researchers to ease the reproduction of scientific work published within the SIGCOMM community. Furthermore, we hope this work will inspire program chairs of future conferences to emphasize reproducibility within the ACM SIGCOMM community as well as will strengthen awareness of researchers.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2019Making simulation results reproducible—Survey, guidelines, and examples based on Gradle and Docker 2023Analyzing Cyber Security Research Practices through a Meta-Research Framework

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.