Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Comparing the effectiveness of three ergonomic risk assessment methods—RULA, LUBA, and NERPA—to predict the upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders

10 references·2 citing·28 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1987Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms5,115 cited
1993RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders3,373 cited
2002The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders652 cited
2009Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work584 cited
2012Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders297 cited
2001LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time265 cited
2007A Comparison of Three Observational Techniques for Assessing Postural Loads in Industry209 cited
2013Comparison of concepts in easy-to-use methods for MSD risk assessment170 cited
2007Musculoskeletal Problems among Workers of an Iranian Rubber Factory147 cited
2013Novel Ergonomic Postural Assessment Method (NERPA) Using Product-Process Computer Aided Engineering for Ergonomic Workplace Design80 cited

Cited by

2020Smart Vest for Real-Time Postural Biofeedback and Ergonomic Risk Assessment62 cited
2020An empirical comparison of OWAS, RULA and REBA based on self-reported discomfort56 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work