SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The discoverability of award-winning undergraduate research in history: Implications for academic libraries
16 references·1 citing·48 second hop
The discoverability of award-winning undergraduate research in history: Implications for academic libraries (2018)The discoverability of award-winning unde…What Do Undergraduate Students Know about Scholarly Communication?: A Mixed Methods Study (2017)What Do Undergraduate Student…Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Scholarly use of social media…The library and undergraduate research in the liberal arts: Present contributions and future opportunities (2016)The library and undergraduate…Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities (2016)Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bib…A Survey of Instructional Support for Undergraduate Research Programs (2015)A Survey of Instructional Sup…Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities (2014)Using altmetrics for assessin…Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network (2014)Online collaboration: Scienti…Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? (2014)Do highly cited researchers s…A Survey of Library Support for Formal Undergraduate Research Programs (2014)A Survey of Library Support f…Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency (2013)Effective Strategies for Incr…An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists (2013)An Introduction to Social Med…Teaching Students How to Research the Past: Historians and Librarians in the Digital Age (2012)Teaching Students How to Rese…International Education Studies (2011)International Education Studi…The Role of Academic Libraries in Mentored Undergraduate Research: A Model of Engagement in the Academic Community (2009)The Role of Academic Librarie…The information-literate historian: a guide to research for history students (2007)The information-literate hist…Doing History : Research and Writing in the Digital Age (2007)Doing History : Research and …A new comparative citation analysis: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, and Web of Science (2021)A new comparative citation an…Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Altmetrics: A manifesto (2010)Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media (2016)A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter (2017)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Ten tips to improve the visibility and dissemination of research for policy makers and practitioners (2017)Academic Metrics and Positioning Strategies (2018)The open access advantage for studies of human electrophysiology: Impact on citations and Altmetrics (2021)Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000)Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study (2004)Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences (2007)Role changing for librarians in the new information technology era (2011)The case for partnering doctoral students with librarians: a synthesis of the literatures (2011)Common Ground at the Nexus of Information Literacy and Scholarly Communication (2013)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites (2015)ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? (2015)When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? S copus versus M endeley for LIS journals (2015)The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (1986)Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1991)The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences (2000)The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures (2017)Science and its significant other: Representing the humanities in bibliometric scholarship (2019)Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable? (2021)Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media (2009)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data (2018)Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis (2021)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)What do we know about the h index? (2007)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)A Comparison of Citation Sources for Reference and Citation-Based Search in Systematic Literature Reviews (2022)Who are the Top 100 Contributors to Social Work Journal Scholarship? A Global Study on Career Impact in the Profession (2022)A PRISMA‐Based Systematic Review on Economic, Social, and Governance Practices: Insights and Research Agenda (2024)Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics (2014)Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics (2015)How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace? (2016)Big Scholarly Data: A Survey (2017)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran (2017)Exploring the role of online EFL learners’ perceived social support in their learning engagement: a structural equation model (2020)Perceived teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement: a meta-analysis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network654 cited
  • 2017Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature572 cited
  • 2011International Education Studies508 cited
  • 2013An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists404 cited
  • 2014Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities207 cited
  • 2014Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?148 cited
  • 2013Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency112 cited
  • 2016Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities65 cited
  • 2009The Role of Academic Libraries in Mentored Undergraduate Research: A Model of Engagement in the Academic Community54 cited
  • 2014A Survey of Library Support for Formal Undergraduate Research Programs28 cited
  • 2007Doing History : Research and Writing in the Digital Age28 cited
  • 2012Teaching Students How to Research the Past: Historians and Librarians in the Digital Age22 cited
  • 2007The information-literate historian: a guide to research for history students22 cited
  • 2015A Survey of Instructional Support for Undergraduate Research Programs19 cited
  • 2017What Do Undergraduate Students Know about Scholarly Communication?: A Mixed Methods Study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited
  • 2016The library and undergraduate research in the liberal arts: Present contributions and future opportunities10 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021A new comparative citation analysis: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, and Web of Science44 cited