A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities

Abstract

What are the parameters that define a posthuman knowing subject, her scientific credibility and ethical accountability? Taking the posthumanities as an emergent field of enquiry based on the convergence of posthumanism and post-anthropocentrism, I argue that posthuman knowledge claims go beyond the critiques of the universalist image of ‘Man’ and of human exceptionalism. The conceptual foundation I envisage for the critical posthumanities is a neo-Spinozist monistic ontology that assumes radical immanence, i.e. the primacy of intelligent and self-organizing matter. This implies that the posthuman knowing subject has to be understood as a relational embodied and embedded, affective and accountable entity and not only as a transcendental consciousness. Two related notions emerge from this claim: firstly, the mind-body continuum – i.e. the embrainment of the body and embodiment of the mind – and secondly, the nature-culture continuum – i.e. ‘naturecultural’ and ‘humanimal’ transversal bonding. The article explores these key conceptual and methodological perspectives and discusses the implications of the critical posthumanities for practices in the contemporary ‘research’ university.

Cite this

Rosi Braidotti (2018). A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities. Theory Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486

@article{rosi2018a,
  title  = {A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities},
  author = {Braidotti, Rosi},
  year   = {2018},
  journal = {Theory Culture & Society},
  doi    = {10.1177/0263276418771486}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,040 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by