SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Biases in forensic experts
0 references·16 citing·42 second hopsampled
Biases in forensic experts (2018)Biases in forensic expertsBiased and Biasing: The Hidden Bias Cascade and Bias Snowball Effects (2025)Biased and Biasing: The Hidde…Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence (2023)Wrongful convictions and clai…Reducing the impact of cognitive bias in decision making: Practical actions for forensic science practitioners (2023)Reducing the impact of cognit…Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources of pro‐prosecution bias in judges (2022)Prosecuting from the bench? E…Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making (2022)Cognitive and human factors i…Towards another paradigm for forensic science? (2021)Towards another paradigm for …Linear Sequential Unmasking–Expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias (2021)Linear Sequential Unmasking–E…The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Why Error Rates Are So Needed, Yet So Elusive (2020)The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Wh…Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016–2019 (2020)Interpol review of fingermark…Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners (2020)Biasability and reliability o…The forensic disclosure model: What should be disclosed to, and by, forensic experts? (2019)The forensic disclosure model…Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts (2019)Perceptions and estimates of …ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work (2019)ISO Standards Addressing Issu…Crime reconstruction and the role of trace materials from crime scene to court (2019)Crime reconstruction and the …A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach (2019)A cultural change to enable i…“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide (2018)“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Lin…Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition (1990)Being and nothingness : a phenomenological essay on ontology (1992)Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. (1993)(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Heuristic Decision Making (2010)The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency (2023)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Implementing blind proficiency testing in forensic laboratories: Motivation, obstacles, and recommendations (2020)Evaluating population affinity estimates in forensic anthropology: Insights from the forensic anthropology database for assessing methods accuracy (FADAMA) (2021)Category judgment: A range-frequency model. (1965)Contemporary issues in forensic science—Worldwide survey results (2021)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Quality Systems—Medical Devices—Particular Requirements for the Application of ISO 9001 (2004)Cognitive bias and the order of examination in forensic anthropological non-metric methods: a pilot study (2021)The biasing impact of irrelevant contextual information on forensic odontology radiograph matching decisions (2021)The shifting narrative of uncertainty: a case for the coherent and consistent consideration of uncertainty in forensic science (2022)Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners. (2017)Fluorescent Nanomaterials for the Development of Latent Fingerprints in Forensic Sciences (2017)Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review (2019)Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions (2019 – 2022) (2022)Visualization and dermatoglyphics of latent fingerprints (sweat pores): Security ink for anticounterfeiting labels and case studies (2022)Mind the gap: The challenges of sustainable forensic science service provision (2023)On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. (1962)Measurement and Control of Response Bias (1991)Treatment of inconclusives in the AFTE range of conclusions (2020)The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science (2021)The scientific reinvention of forensic science (2023)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Science Serving Justice: Opportunities for Enhancing Integrity in Forensic Science in Africa (2021)The secret life of crime labs (2023)Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA): Validity, reliability, cognitive bias, and error rate (2025)On the reality of cognitive illusions. (1996)Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity (2002)Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (2008)A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting (2024)Beyond Discrimination: Generative AI Applications and Ethical Challenges in Forensic Psychiatry (2024)Towards a forensic semiotics (2024)Are legal experts better decision makers than jurors? A psychological evaluation of the role of juries in the 21st century (2024)Justice without bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at reducing jury bias in Rape and sexual assault trials (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021Linear Sequential Unmasking–Expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias104 cited
  • 2022Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making80 cited
  • 2018“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide74 cited
  • 2023Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence62 cited
  • 2019ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work60 cited
  • 2019A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach49 cited
  • 2019Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts45 cited
  • 2020Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016–201944 cited
  • 2020The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Why Error Rates Are So Needed, Yet So Elusive43 cited
  • 2019The forensic disclosure model: What should be disclosed to, and by, forensic experts?40 cited
  • 2023Reducing the impact of cognitive bias in decision making: Practical actions for forensic science practitioners31 cited
  • 2025Biased and Biasing: The Hidden Bias Cascade and Bias Snowball Effects29 cited
  • 2021Towards another paradigm for forensic science?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

28 cited
  • 2022Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources of pro‐prosecution bias in judges28 cited
  • 2019Crime reconstruction and the role of trace materials from crime scene to court27 cited
  • 2020Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners25 cited