SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Preprints in medical research: Progress and principles
2 references·6 citing·40 second hop
Preprints in medical research: Progress and principles (2018)Preprints in medical research: Progress a…Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science (2018)Preprints: An underutilized m…Anatomy of the Epidemiological Literature on the 2003 SARS Outbreaks in Hong Kong and Toronto: A Time-Stratified Review (2010)Anatomy of the Epidemiologica…The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review (2023)The use and acceptability of …Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations (2022)Assessing Open Science practi…Reporting all results efficiently: A RARE proposal to open up the file drawer (2021)Reporting all results efficie…Preprint Servers in Kidney Disease Research (2020)Preprint Servers in Kidney Di…Preprints in Scholarly Communication: Re-Imagining Metrics and Infrastructures (2019)Preprints in Scholarly Commun…Preprints with The Lancet : joining online research discussion platforms (2018)Preprints with The Lancet : j…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Psychological impact on SARS survivors: Critical review of the English language literature. (2014)A Bibliometric Analysis of PubMed Literature on Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (2016)Over‐promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID ‐19 crisis (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns (2020)Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 (2021)Medical Preprints—A Debate Worth Having (2017)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Preprints with The Lancet are here to stay (2020)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science (2019)The Pioneering Role of Sci in Post Publication Public Peer Review (P4R) (2021)Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article (2019)Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility (2020)How Preprint Affects the Publishing Process: Duration of the Peer Review Process between bioRxiv and Journal Papers (2022)Can open peer review improve uptake of preprints into policies? Evidence from a causal inference (2023)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)False-Positive Psychology (2011)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Exploring enablers and barriers to implementing the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines: a theory-based survey of journal editors (2023)Is biomedical research self-correcting? Modelling insights on the persistence of spurious science (2024)Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results (2025)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices (2022)Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy (2023)Rethinking how and when to report descriptions of behavior change content within interventions: a case study of an ongoing physical activity trial (ready steady 3.0) (2023)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science136 cited
  • 2010Anatomy of the Epidemiological Literature on the 2003 SARS Outbreaks in Hong Kong and Toronto: A Time-Stratified Review46 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Reporting all results efficiently: A RARE proposal to open up the file drawer30 cited
  • 2023The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review23 cited
  • 2019Preprints in Scholarly Communication: Re-Imagining Metrics and Infrastructures19 cited
  • 2018Preprints with The Lancet : joining online research discussion platforms16 cited
  • 2022Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations15 cited
  • 2020Preprint Servers in Kidney Disease Research14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work