Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Prior Odds of Testing a True Effect in Cognitive and Social Psychology

11 references·11 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
2017Redefine statistical significance2,771 cited
2014Beyond Power Calculations1,341 cited
2017Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature760 cited
2014p -Curve and Effect Size713 cited
2002Calculated risks: how to know when numbers deceive you437 cited
2015Replication in Psychological Science282 cited
2014Sailing From the Seas of Chaos Into the Corridor of Stability266 cited
2016On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science150 cited

Cited by

2020Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully64 cited
2021Reproducibility and replicability crisis: How management compares to psychology and economics – A systematic review of literature58 cited
2022A Review of Multisite Replication Projects in Social Psychology: Is It Viable to Sustain Any Confidence in Social Psychology’s Knowledge Base?53 cited
2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Designing police lineups to maximize memory performance.

51 cited

2020Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability41 cited

2022Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports22 cited

2018Redefine or justify? Comments on the alpha debate21 cited

2019The World of Research Has Gone Berserk: Modeling the Consequences of Requiring “Greater Statistical Stringency” for Scientific Publication11 cited

2021A Cautionary Note on Estimating Effect Size11 cited

2020Default sensitivity in attempts at social influence10 cited

2022Theoretical false positive psychology8 cited