SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Revistas depredadoras: una nueva amenaza a las publicaciones científicas
9 references·0 citing·31 second hop
Revistas depredadoras: una nueva amenaza a las publicaciones científicas (2018)Revistas depredadoras: una nueva amenaza …Mystery as controversial list of predatory publishers disappears (2017)Mystery as controversial list…Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals (2017)Identifying Predatory or Pseu…Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large (2016)Trends in scientific publishi…Characteristics of Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Our Observations in the Academic World (2016)Characteristics of Hijacked J…Predatory journals in psychiatry: A note of caution (2015)Predatory journals in psychia…Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Firm action needed on predato…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing (2013)Investigating journals: The d…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Questionable papers in citation databases as an issue for literature review (2017)Say no to evil: Predatory journals, what we should know (2017)An insight into predatory journals (2020)Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers (2013)Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: A global outbreak with rising trend: A review (2014)Publishing in predatory open access journals: Authors' perspectives (2019)Academic E-Mail Overload and the Burden of “Academic Spam” (2020)Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive (2021)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)“Blacklists” and “whitelists”: a salutary warning concerning the prevalence of racist language in discussions of predatory publishing (2018)Discussion document: Predatory Publishing (2019)ACADEMIA SHOULD STOP USING BEALL’S LISTS AND REVIEW THEIR USE IN PREVIOUS STUDIES (2023)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)To publish and perish: A Faustian bargain or a Hobson's choice (2016)Predatory Journals: A Threat to Scholarly Publishing (2018)Majority of Most-Cited Articles in Top Plastic Surgery Journals Do Not Receive Funding (2020)The Ethics of Scientific Publishing: Black, White, and “Fifty Shades of Gray” (2017)Death of scientific journals after 350 years (2018)Open Access Medical Journals: Promise, Perils, and Pitfalls (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing349 cited
  • 2015Firm action needed on predatory journals242 cited
  • 2016Characteristics of Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Our Observations in the Academic World43 cited
  • 2017Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals33 cited
  • 2015Predatory journals in psychiatry: A note of caution29 cited
  • 2016Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large26 cited
  • 2017Mystery as controversial list of predatory publishers disappears20 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work