Rethinking Rights-Based Mental Health Laws

Abstract

Mental health laws exist in many countries to regulate the involuntary detention and treatment of individuals with serious mental illnesses. ‘Rights-based legalism’ is a term used to describe mental health laws that refer to the rights of individuals with mental illnesses somewhere in their provisions. The advent of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities makes it timely to rethink the way in which the rights of individuals to autonomy and liberty are balanced against state interests in protecting individuals from harm to self or others. This collection addresses some of the current issues and problems arising from rights-based mental health laws. The chapters have been grouped in five parts as follows: Historical Foundations The International Human Rights Framework and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Gaps Between Law and Practice Review Processes and the Role of Tribunals Access to Mental

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 93 citations exist upstream.