References

• 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
• 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
• 2005Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources2,042 cited
• 2015Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada958 cited
• 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
• 1997Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews506 cited
• 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews330 cited
• 2005Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.257 cited
• 2013Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough224 cited
• 2014Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review218 cited
• 2013Patterns of graduate students' information seeking behavior: a meta‐synthesis of the literature