Article2018

QALYs in 2018—Advantages and Concerns

155 citations0/0 files storedJAMA

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Healthcare Policy and Management Healthcare cost, quality, practices

Abstract

This Viewpoint reviews the rationale for measuring health outcomes using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and discusses the advantages and limitations of the measure and its role in attempts to define and promote the practice of high-value medicine.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 155 citations exist upstream.

References

2014Updating Cost-Effectiveness — The Curious Resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY Threshold 2016Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine

Cited by

2019Overview of Cost-effectiveness Analysis 2019Spillover Effects on Caregivers’ and Family Members’ Utility: A Systematic Review of the Literature 2018Value-Based Health Care Meets Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 2020Challenges in synthesising cost-effectiveness estimates 2021Diversity of social networks versus quality of social support: Which is more protective for health-related quality of life among older adults?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.