Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Testing homogeneity of effect sizes in pooling 2x2 contingency tables from multiple studies: a comparison of methods

12 references·1 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
1954The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments5,374 cited
2006Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?4,245 cited
2007Recent developments in meta‐analysis590 cited
2001A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis571 cited
2015Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran's Q test' in meta‐analysis312 cited
2000An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data278 cited
2005The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis73 cited
2010Testing for Homogeneity in Meta-Analysis I. The One-Parameter Case: Standardized Mean Difference64 cited
1997Homogeneity tests in meta-analysis: a Monte Carlo comparison of statistical power and Type I error59 cited

Cited by

2020On the exact null-distribution of a test for homogeneity of the risk ratio in meta-analysis of studies with rare events6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work