SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What is a ‘complex systematic review’? Criteria, definition, and examples
10 references·0 citing·51 second hop
What is a ‘complex systematic review’? Criteria, definition, and examples (2018)What is a ‘complex systematic review’? Cr…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review (2016)All health researchers should…A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method (2016)A scoping review identifies m…The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews (2015)The Joanna Briggs Institute r…Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use (2015)Individual Participant Data (…Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach (2013)Complex interventions and the…Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Clarifying differences betwee…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews (2008)Using Existing Systematic Rev…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)D-Cycloserine Augmentation of Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders (2017)Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach? (2017)The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis. (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Screening for Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Evidence Review (2009)Effective healthcare cost-containment policies: A systematic review (2018)Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review (2020)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014)Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) (2015)A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences (2016)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches (2018)Transformative learning in the field of sustainability: a systematic literature review (1999-2019) (2020)Mindfulness-based programmes for mental health promotion in adults in nonclinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)Building Realist Program Theory for Large Complex and Messy Interventions (2017)Qualitative synthesis: A guide to conducting a meta-ethnography (2018)Scoping reviews in health professions education: challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology (2019)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Registered trials address questions already answered with high-certainty evidence: A sample of current redundant research (2021)Reports of randomised control trials should begin and conclude with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant trials: a 25-year audit of the quality of trial reports (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence (2016)Perinatal health outcomes and care among asylum seekers and refugees: a systematic review of systematic reviews (2018)The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review (2019)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2015The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews1,135 cited
  • 2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methods1,061 cited
  • 2015Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use361 cited
  • 2013Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach206 cited
  • 2016A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method159 cited
  • 2008Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews144 cited
  • 2016All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review22 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work