SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories
14 references·16 citing·44 second hop
Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories (2019)Intellectual contributions meriting autho…Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Transparency in authors’ cont…Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days (2018)Thousands of scientists publi…Citation analysis of scientific categories (2017)Citation analysis of scientif…Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science (2017)Authorship Norms and Project …Authorship and contribution disclosures (2017)Authorship and contribution d…Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production (2016)Contributorship and division …Authorship policies of scientific journals: Table 1 (2015)Authorship policies of scient…Publishing: Credit where credit is due (2014)Publishing: Credit where cred…Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Honorary and ghost authorship…The write position (2007)The write positionCredit Where Credit is Due (2007)Credit Where Credit is DueHyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern…Communication, Competition, and Secrecy: The Production and Dissemination of Research-Related Information in Genetics (1991)Communication, Competition, a…Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers (1986)Guidelines on Authorship of M…Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines (2023)Transparency in conducting an…“The person in power told me to”—European PhD students’ perspectives on guest authorship and good authorship practice (2023)“The person in power told me …Cancer research across Africa: a comparative bibliometric analysis (2022)Cancer research across Africa…Using scientific authorship criteria as a tool for equitable inclusion in global health research (2021)Using scientific authorship c…Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)Ten strategies for avoiding a…Say my name, say my name: Academic authorship conventions between editorial policies and disciplinary practices (2021)Say my name, say my name: Aca…Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research (2021)Contemporary authorship guide…Survey of equal contributions in biomedical research publications (2020)Survey of equal contributions…No room for ambiguity (2020)No room for ambiguityICMJE criteria for authorship: why the criticisms are not justified? (2020)ICMJE criteria for authorship…Effects of Inferred Gender on Patterns of Co‐Authorship in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Publications (2020)Effects of Inferred Gender on…Considering author sequence in all-author co-citation analysis (2020)Considering author sequence i…Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility (2020)Authorship and justice: Credi…Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams (2019)Researchers’ Perceptions of E…Contributorship, Not Authorship: Use CRediT to Indicate Who Did What (2019)Contributorship, Not Authorsh…Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice (2018)Scientific authorship, plural…Little Science, Big Science (1963)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)What is research collaboration? (1997)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2010)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis (2008)Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position (2010)The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity (2021)Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts (1982)Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Knowing and Interacting: A Study of Culture, Practices, and Resources in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Classroom Guided by a Cognitive Apprenticeship Metaphor (1995)Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry (2014)Cooperation Makes a Group be More Creative (2018)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review (2018)Flat teams drive scientific innovation (2022)The Provision of Incentives in Firms (1999)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia (2019)Division of labor in collaborative knowledge production: The role of team size and interdisciplinarity (2020)How Do Travel Costs Shape Collaboration? (2020)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies (2019)The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature (2021)Generative AI and the Automating of Academia (2023)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences (2021)Collective credit allocation in science (2014)Interdisciplinary and collaborative work: Framing promotion and tenure practices and policies (2017)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin (1994)Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?499 cited
  • 2011Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey477 cited
  • 2018Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication390 cited
  • 2014Publishing: Credit where credit is due351 cited
  • 2016Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production264 cited
  • 2018Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days241 cited
  • 2007The write position202 cited
  • 2017Authorship and contribution disclosures188 cited
  • 1991Communication, Competition, and Secrecy: The Production and Dissemination of Research-Related Information in Genetics178 cited
  • 1986Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers118 cited
  • 2017Citation analysis of scientific categories114 cited
  • 2015Authorship policies of scientific journals: Table 188 cited
  • 2007Credit Where Credit is Due85 cited
  • 2017Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science64 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

65 cited
  • 2021Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research57 cited
  • 2020Considering author sequence in all-author co-citation analysis50 cited
  • 2020Survey of equal contributions in biomedical research publications48 cited
  • 2021Using scientific authorship criteria as a tool for equitable inclusion in global health research47 cited
  • 2022Cancer research across Africa: a comparative bibliometric analysis35 cited
  • 2023“The person in power told me to”—European PhD students’ perspectives on guest authorship and good authorship practice33 cited
  • 2023Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines32 cited
  • 2021Say my name, say my name: Academic authorship conventions between editorial policies and disciplinary practices30 cited
  • 2020Effects of Inferred Gender on Patterns of Co‐Authorship in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Publications28 cited
  • 2018Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice28 cited
  • 2021Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing24 cited
  • 2020No room for ambiguity24 cited
  • 2020ICMJE criteria for authorship: why the criticisms are not justified?24 cited
  • 2020Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility22 cited
  • 2019Contributorship, Not Authorship: Use CRediT to Indicate Who Did What20 cited