Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reproducibility failures are essential to scientific inquiry

10 references·16 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions35,276 cited
1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions21,164 cited
20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
2016What does research reproducibility mean?1,291 cited
2018Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?416 cited
2012Ignorance: how it drives science414 cited
2012Ignorance: How it drives science200 cited
2015Reproducible research can still be wrong: Adopting a prevention approach193 cited
2016Failure: why science is so successful129 cited

Cited by

2019Rinse and Repeat: Understanding the Value of Replication across Different Ways of Knowing65 cited
2022Advancing Entrepreneurship Theory Through Replication: A Case Study on Contemporary Methodological Challenges, Future Best Practices, and an Entreaty for Communality59 cited
2019Does repeat synthesis in materials chemistry obey a power law?58 cited
2020The limits of replicability55 cited
2021Media and social media attention to retracted articles according to Altmetric55 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019Characterizing scientific failure32 cited

2019A New Account of Replication in the Experimental Life Sciences27 cited

2021Should We Strive to Make Science Bias-Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis27 cited

2022Kinds of Replicability: Different Terms and Different Functions24 cited

2024Type I Error Rates are Not Usually Inflated24 cited

2022Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports22 cited

2018“Reproducible” Research in Mathematical Sciences Requires Changes in our Peer Review Culture and Modernization of our Current Publication Approach22 cited

2020“Repeated sampling from the same population?” A critique of Neyman and Pearson’s responses to Fisher19 cited

2020Science’s moral economy of repair: Replication and the circulation of reference17 cited

2020Learning Lessons on Reproducibility and Replicability in Large Scale Genome-Wide Association Studies14 cited

2020Replicability Crisis and Scientific Reforms: Overlooked Issues and Unmet Challenges13 cited