Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Upgrading for whom? Relationship coffee, value chain interventions and rural development in Indonesia

16 references·16 citing·42 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2005The governance of global value chains7,218 cited
1999International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain3,194 cited
2002How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?2,582 cited
2004Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review1,196 cited
2000Governance and Trade in Fresh Vegetables: The Impact of UK Supermarkets on the African Horticulture Industry1,093 cited
2011Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world1,057 cited
2005Global Capitalism and Commodity Chains: Looking Back, Going Forward909 cited
2005Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua?794 cited
2014Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains and Industrial Clusters: Why Governance Matters748 cited
2008Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research600 cited
2004Monitoring Elite Capture in Community‐Driven Development550 cited
2005Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry433 cited
2010Integrating Poverty and Environmental Concerns into Value‐Chain Analysis: A Conceptual Framework417 cited
2009Which Way is “Up” in Upgrading? Trajectories of Change in the Value Chain for South African Wine

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

400 cited

2001How Do We Define Value Chains and Production Networks? *397 cited

2008Mainstreaming Fair Trade Coffee: From Partnership to Traceability388 cited

Cited by

2020The hidden costs of environmental upgrading in global value chains124 cited
2022Sustainability issues along the coffee chain: From the field to the cup113 cited
2019Conceptualizing inclusiveness of smallholder value chain integration104 cited
2019The domestic political economy of upgrading in global value chains: how politics shapes pathways for upgrading in Rwanda’s coffee sector *78 cited
2020Geographies of production II: Thinking through the state68 cited
2018Global production networks, regional development trajectories and smallholder livelihoods in the Global South61 cited
2021A multidimensional perspective on child labor in the value chain: The case of the cocoa value chain in West Africa54 cited
2020The political economy of moving up in global value chains: how Malaysia added value to its natural resources through industrial policy42 cited
2023The challenges of a sustainable cocoa value chain: A study of traditional and “fine or flavour” cocoa produced by the kichwas in the ecuadorian Amazon region36 cited
2024How can sustainable business models distribute value more equitably in global value chains? Introducing “value chain profit sharing” as an emerging alternative to fair trade, direct trade, or solidarity trade36 cited
2021Effectiveness-equity tradeoffs in enforcing exclusionary supply chain policies: Lessons from the Amazonian cattle sector35 cited
2020Creaming off commodity profits: Europe’s re-export boom and Africa’s earnings crisis in the coffee and cocoa sectors29 cited
2020The Diverging Understandings of Quality by Coffee Chain Actors—Insights from Colombian Producers and Austrian Roasters27 cited
2019Moderating Role of Connoisseur Consumers on Sustainable Consumption and Dynamics Capabilities of Indonesian Single Origin Coffee Shops22 cited
2022The role played by relational turbulence in managing agency problems among value chain partners in the sharing economy: A review of the antecedents, benefits, risks, and boundary conditions12 cited
2021How the elite capture critique is used to legitimise top-down control of development resources2 cited