Addressing Methodological Challenges in Culture-Comparative Research

Ronald D. Fischer · Ype H. Poortinga

91 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cultural Differences and Values Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

We address methodological challenges in cross-cultural and cultural psychology. First, we describe weaknesses in (quasi-)experimental designs, noting that cross-cultural designs typically do not allow any conclusive evidence of causality. Second, we argue that loose adherence to methodological principles of psychology and a focus on differences, while neglecting similarities, is distorting the literature. We highlight the importance of effect sizes and discuss the role of Bayesian statistics and meta-analysis for cross-cultural research. Third, we highlight issues of measurement bias and lack of equivalence, but note that recent large-scale projects involving researchers across many countries from the beginning of a study have much potential for overcoming biases and improving standards of equivalence. Fourth, we address some implications of multilevel models. Cultural processes are multilevel by definition and recent statistical advances can be used to explore these issues further. We believe this is an area where much theoretical work needs to be done and more rigorous methods applied. Fifth, we argue that the definition of culture and the psychological organization of cross-cultural differences as well as the definition of cultural populations to which research findings are generalized requires more attention. Sixth, we address the scope for anchoring cross-cultural research in biological variables and by asking multiple questions simultaneously, as advocated by Tinbergen for classical ethology. Bringing these discussions together, we provide recommendations for enhancing the methodological strength of culture-comparative studies to advance cross-cultural psychology as a scientific discipline.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 91 citations exist upstream.

References

2007G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences 1991Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation 1981Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values 1992Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries 2009Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience 2011False-Positive Psychology

Cited by

2020Navigating cross-cultural research: methodological and ethical considerations 2018Social Value Orientation and Endorsement of Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism: An Exploratory Study Comparing Individuals From North America and South Korea 2025Why We Need to Rethink Measurement Invariance: The Role of Measurement Invariance for Cross-Cultural Research 2023Building Sustainable Global Collaborative Networks: Recommendations from Music Studies and the Social Sciences

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.