SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research-agenda bias
2 references·0 citing·8 second hop
Research-agenda bias (2018)Research-agenda biasTackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James LindInitiative, 2003–2013 (2013)Tackling treatment uncertaint…Evidence in agenda setting: new directions for the Cochrane Collaboration (2013)Evidence in agenda setting: n…The Cochrane Library (2005)Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting (2009)A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice (2010)Cochrane acute respiratory infections group's stakeholder engagement project identified systematic review priority areas (2018)Publish or Perish (2007)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using HTA and guideline development as a tool for research priority setting the NICE way: reducing research waste by identifying the right research to fund. (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James LindInitiative, 2003–2013103 cited
  • 2013Evidence in agenda setting: new directions for the Cochrane Collaboration30 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work