SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation
16 references·1 citing·50 second hop
Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation (2018)Performance of an Additional Task During …Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study (2017)Is partially automated drivin…Effects of Cognitive Load on Driving Performance: The Cognitive Control Hypothesis (2017)Effects of Cognitive Load on …Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation – Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment (2016)Secondary task engagement and…Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents (2014)Public Opinion on Automated D…Learning from experience: Familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving (2014)Learning from experience: Fam…Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence (2014)Effects of adaptive cruise co…Continuous versus intermittent presentation of visual eco-driving advice (2014)Continuous versus intermitten…Tactical Driving Behavior With Different Levels of Automation (2013)Tactical Driving Behavior Wit…Human Factors Issues Associated with Limited Ability Autonomous Driving Systems: Drivers’ Allocation of Visual Attention to the Forward Roadway (2013)Human Factors Issues Associat…Control Task Substitution in Semiautomated Driving (2012)Control Task Substitution in …Automated Driving: Human-Factors Issues and Design Solutions (2012)Automated Driving: Human-Fact…Multiple Resources and Mental Workload (2008)Multiple Resources and Mental…A Systemic Model for Driver-in-Control (2003)A Systemic Model for Driver-i…Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance (2002)Malleable Attentional Resourc…From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles (1996)From fly-by-wire to drive-by-…Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research (1988)Development of NASA-TLX (Task…Driving automation state-of-mind: Using training to instigate rapid mental model development (2019)Driving automation state-of-m…Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems (1995)A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation (2000)Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance (2004)Autonomous Driving Systems: A Preliminary Naturalistic Study of the Tesla Model S (2017)The “Out-of-the-Loop” concept in automated driving: proposed definition, measures and implications (2018)Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures (2019)Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. (1984)Varieties of attention (1984)Interaction in 4-second bursts (2005)Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research (2008)The Psychology of Fatigue (2013)Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (2015)Ironies of automation (1983)Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (1987)Attention and automation: New perspectives on mental underload and performance (2002)The Trouble with Autopilots (2017)The Effect of Urgency of Take-Over Requests During Highly Automated Driving Under Distraction Conditions (2021)Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse (1997)Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. (1998)Cognitive Offloading (2016)Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research (2017)Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies (2019)Multiple resources and performance prediction (2002)Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention (2002)State of science: mental workload in ergonomics (2014)Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review (2018)Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. (2000)Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later (2006)The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation (1995)Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis (2014)Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving (2018)NASA-TLX Assessment of Surgeon Workload Variation Across Specialties (2018)Categorization of action slips. (1981)Surfing Uncertainty (2015)Automated driving reduces perceived workload, but monitoring causes higher cognitive load than manual driving (2018)Domains of cognition and their assessment (2019)Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability (2002)Driver error or designer error: Using the Perceptual Cycle Model to explore the circumstances surrounding the fatal Tesla crash on 7th May 2016 (2017)A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): a review-based study (2019)Toward human-vehicle collaboration: Review and perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving (2021)A theory of human motivation. (1943)The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. (1999)Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective (2016)A THEORY OF HUMAN MOTIVATION (2017)User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles (2017)The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1988Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research15,045 cited
  • 2008Multiple Resources and Mental Workload2,163 cited
  • 2014Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents1,382 cited
  • 2014Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence740 cited
  • 2002Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance405 cited
  • 2012Control Task Substitution in Semiautomated Driving335 cited
  • 2017Effects of Cognitive Load on Driving Performance: The Cognitive Control Hypothesis299 cited
  • 2017Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study244 cited
  • 1996From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles202 cited
  • 2013Human Factors Issues Associated with Limited Ability Autonomous Driving Systems: Drivers’ Allocation of Visual Attention to the Forward Roadway183 cited
  • 2016Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation – Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment149 cited
  • 2012Automated Driving: Human-Factors Issues and Design Solutions145 cited
  • 2014Learning from experience: Familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving117 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2003A Systemic Model for Driver-in-Control72 cited
  • 2013Tactical Driving Behavior With Different Levels of Automation62 cited
  • 2014Continuous versus intermittent presentation of visual eco-driving advice50 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Driving automation state-of-mind: Using training to instigate rapid mental model development47 cited